An F/A-18 Hornet viewed from the cargo ramp of a C-2 Greyhound [3008x1960]


Sure thing - With that sea that is endless a backdrop, It's amazing. I joined the fresh air Force because of this. Being a loadmaster on a cargo airplane. But my daddy talked me down as it does not transfer ...



This image with the title of "An F/A-18 Hornet viewed from the cargo ramp of a C-2 Greyhound [3008x1960]" is one of a large collection of pictures from the category Military Pics . We collect quality images, from a social network website reddit.com

Source: To view the original source also read the full comments of the original poster as well as from other redditor, you can click on the following Link.

Some random comments on reddit about An F/A-18 Hornet viewed from the cargo ramp of a C-2 Greyhound [3008x1960]

  • Sure thing - With that endless sea as a backdrop, It's amazing.
  • I joined the Air Force for this reason. Being a loadmaster on a cargo plane. But my father talked me down because it doesn't transfer into the real world
  • Dude, hold onto my beer, I'm gonna land in it.
  • Damn, it won't even fit in a Galaxy which has a 19' wide cargo bay. EDIT: Wrote "wingspan" instead of describing it as the width of the cargo bay.
  • Eh, just fold the wings up. It'll fit.
  • Mid air wing fold landing
  • hence the beer holding being necessary.
  • Hey if the F-8 (that monster) can fly with the wings folded I'm sure the F-18 will with enough speed.
  • Hmm, but can the C-2 fly that fast? If it just rams into the thing at a relative speed of 400nmph it's not going to be much of a landing.
  • Just the tip
  • Land in it, take controls of the C2, then land that.
  • What's the minimum safe cruising speed, if that's what it's called, for a hornet? Basically how slow can it safely go without having to worry about stalling? Just curious because obviously that greyhound isn't going too fast.
  • But this isn't a Navy Super Hornet. It's an F/A-18C as you can tell from then rounded air intakes.
  • Thanks. Do you know the actual number though? Just curious.
  • Googled around a bit, and it seems to be 130-ish knots. Keep in mind aircraft carriers sail into the wind so that gets added in, and there's a host of other variables (aircraft weight at landing, degree of flaps used, etc). For comparison, a 747 (with all that wing area) lands somewhere around the same speed. So it's pretty impressive a little plane optimized for supersonic flight can get that slow. Craziest of all was the Space Shuttle at 200-250 knots.
  • The Space Shuttle flew like a truck, by all accounts. It wasn't really optimized for atmospheric flight, not to mention the fact that it couldn't fly under its own power.
  • I'm surprised it never had a dumb ol' landing accident like so many other aircraft do. With landing speeds like that, you're just asking for a gear collapse or wheel brake/braking chute failure. But maybe they knew what they were doing when they built the thing. Well, most of the time.
  • Read more comments


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *