Iraqi T-55 knocked out by an APFSDS hit to the glacis plate [1985x1034]


Basically, then he must have been obliterated if the guy was at his station. He would have been struck in the chest by a jet of burning/molten uranium that is depleted. He was most likely at the very least partially ...



This image with the title of "Iraqi T-55 knocked out by an APFSDS hit to the glacis plate [1985x1034]" is one of a large collection of pictures from the category Tank . We collect quality images, from a social network website reddit.com

Source: To view the original source also read the full comments of the original poster as well as from other redditor, you can click on the following Link.

Some random comments on reddit about Iraqi T-55 knocked out by an APFSDS hit to the glacis plate [1985x1034]

  • Pretty much, if the guy was at his station then he must have been obliterated.
  • He would have been struck in the chest by a jet of burning/molten depleted uranium. He was probably at least partially vaporized.
  • I thought the UK didn't use DU...
  • During the first Gulf War each Challenger was equipped with 12 CHARM-1 depleted uranium rounds, for dealing with Iraqi T-72M tanks. The UK makes use of both tungsten-nickel and DU penetrators, but the state of the UK's current stock of DU ammunition is a bit confusing. The current stockpile is about to expire and there's no easy way of producing new ones.
  • A penetrating rod made of soft cheese would probably have been as effective. The UK does have DU rounds. But tungsten is probably more popular.
  • APFSDS rounds pretty much have to be DU, nothing else is hard enough and heavy enough while still being able to stand up to being fired out of a massive cannon.
  • Tungsten can be used, DU is just a more effective material.
  • Tungsten.
  • Too brittle.
  • https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&mode=form&tab=core&id=d94851aa1add07dae6802b13f63dd4ed , https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&mode=form&tab=core&id=a133f7d2ad53264cb518d8ef78d71ebc http://www.gd-ots.com/MCA_25mm_tungsten.html , http://www.gd-ots.com/lca_120mm_kew.html and http://www.gd-ots.com/download/120mm%20KE-W.pdf Some links that caught my eye on Google, the two sites seem good. US Government seems to have bought/buying it and General Dynamics (who are huge) don't seem to mind talking about it. This one is worth a look too, - see Page 7 http://fhp.osd.mil/du/pdfs/1999279_0000010.pdf The entire thing is a long boring paper about the differences. Page 9 has a basic breakdown comparison. Later on is results and references.
  • I really shouldn't have said only thing that works, I should have said "best thing by a large margin." Tungsten works Its just so much more brittle than DU that it brings a bunch of downsides to the table. It'll still kill tanks, just not as well.
  • Read more comments


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *